• Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Interviews
  • Sports
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Orile-Agege PBAT/KOH CC, City Boy Movement Flags-off Campaign with Free Medical Outreach
  • Heritage Energy Relocates Over 100 Uzere residents As Multi-agency Investigation Continues
  • LIRS Reaffirms Commitment to Staff Welfare, Professional Development
  • AFRIMA Founder Mike Dada Joins ACG Advisory Board
  • Eleganza Plans to Revive Manufacturing Operations at Alaba- Suru
  • NDLEA Arrests Ugandan Woman with Cocaine Concealed in Private Parts; Uncovers Multi-billion-Naira Drug Cartels
  • Nigeria Reaffirms Commitment to ECOWAS Migration, Border Security Cooperation 
  • Atiku: Fayose Moment has Arrived for CJN Kekere-Ekun
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Gazelle NewsThe Gazelle News
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Interviews
  • Sports
The Gazelle NewsThe Gazelle News
Home » Alleged $9.7m Terrorism Financing: Court Denies Bail To Bauchi Finance Commissioner, Others 
featured

Alleged $9.7m Terrorism Financing: Court Denies Bail To Bauchi Finance Commissioner, Others 

Justice Emeka Nwite ,Yakubu Adamu, Terrorism Financing,
Abimbola OgunaikeBy Abimbola OgunaikeJanuary 5, 2026Updated:January 5, 2026No Comments26 Views
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Emeka Nwite  on Monday, 5 January, 2026 declined to grant a bail application filed by Yakubu Adamu, Commissioner of Finance, Bauchi State, and his co-defendants who are facing alleged $9.7 million terrorism financing.

Justice Nwite, in a ruling, held that the offences with which the defendants are charged with, threatens national security and public safety.

The judge further held that terrorism related offences threatened social order and pre-trial release could endanger the public, hence, such bail cannot be granted.

Justice Emeka, however, made an order for accelerated hearing of the matter.

“I am not unmindful of the constitutional provision of Section 36(5) which provides that every person who is charged with criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until he is proven guilty.

“But I must not hesitate to state that the said constitutional provision is not an absolute right.

“In the consideration of application for bail, all factors have to be considered,” he said.

Citing a 2001 case involving Bamaiyi and the State, the judge said the apex court held that “it is proper to consider the nature of the offence, the nature of the evidence in support of it and the severity of the punishment which conviction will entail.”

He said the court took these critical factors as to availability to stand trial into consideration, hence, “these are not matters that should be glossed over.

 “I cannot say more than this erudite jurist.

“Our criminal justice system has its stipulations and safeguards for the prosecutor, the accused and the victim.

“In the proper operation of that system, it can be said that it is in the interest of the society and with those safeguards that if an application for bail pending trial, there is a good reason to believe or strongly agreed that the accused will not jump bail, thereby making himself available to stand his trial and /or will not interfere with witnesses thereby constituting an obstacle in the way of justice, the court will be acting within the undoubted discretion to grant bail.

“I have carefully considered the affidavit evidence available before me in this point in time.

“And I have also considered the proof of evidence, especially the statement of Dan Lawan Abdulmumuni and other prosecution witnesses together with grave threat to national security and public safety this case pose.

“And I have also taking cognizance that terrorism related offences threatened social order and pre-trial release could endanger the public.

“In my view, the prosecution/respondent has succeeded in raising a reasonable presumption of criminal responsibility on the part of the applicants (Adamu and co-defendants).

“In view of the foregoing, I am of the humble view and I so hold that interest of justice will be met by giving the matter accelerated hearing.

“Consequently, the application is hereby refused”.

Justice Nwite adjourned the matter until Tuesday, 13 January, 2025 for commencement of trial.

It was gathered that Adamu and his co-defendants were remanded in Kuje Correctional Centre following their arraignment on a 10-count charge on Wednesday, 31 December, 2025, and the judge fixed today for ruling on their bail applications.

Source: PM News.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Abimbola Ogunaike

    Related Posts

    Orile-Agege PBAT/KOH CC, City Boy Movement Flags-off Campaign with Free Medical Outreach

    November 9, 2026

    Heritage Energy Relocates Over 100 Uzere residents As Multi-agency Investigation Continues

    November 9, 2026

    LIRS Reaffirms Commitment to Staff Welfare, Professional Development

    November 9, 2026

    Orile-Agege PBAT/KOH CC, City Boy Movement Flags-off Campaign with Free Medical Outreach

    November 9, 2026

    Heritage Energy Relocates Over 100 Uzere residents As Multi-agency Investigation Continues

    November 9, 2026

    LIRS Reaffirms Commitment to Staff Welfare, Professional Development

    November 9, 2026

    AFRIMA Founder Mike Dada Joins ACG Advisory Board

    November 9, 2026
    © 2026 All Rights Reserved. The Gazelle News. Designed By DeedsTech.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.