• Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Interviews
  • Sports
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • Poverty Deprives Developing Nations From AI Gains – YabaTech Don 
  • Lagos FA Chairman Hails Flying Eagles On World Cup Ticket; Congratulates NFF leadership
  • Sonupe Hails Tinubu’s Achievements; Praises Orelope-Adefulire, Bisi Yusuf; Pledges Support For Tinubu’s Re-election 
  • FG Announces Major Overhaul of Electricity Distribution Companies, Begins Pilot Scheme with 2 DisCos
  • LG Primary Polls: Lagos Inaugurates Appeal Committee; Pedro Is Chairman; Lanre Ogunyemi, Pelumi Members 
  • Embrace Benefits of straight, Healthy Teeth, Confident Smiles, Ajayi Advises Nigeria
  • 25 years After First Forensic Lab in Lagos, NDLEA Gets Two More in Abuja, Enugu
  • Sanwo-Olu: A Statesman as Governor
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Gazelle NewsThe Gazelle News
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Education
  • Interviews
  • Sports
The Gazelle NewsThe Gazelle News
Home » Ogun Tribunal Dismisses PDP’s Objection To Comparison Of Statements By Witnesses
News

Ogun Tribunal Dismisses PDP’s Objection To Comparison Of Statements By Witnesses

Khadijah OlowodeBy Khadijah OlowodeJuly 18, 2023No Comments0 Views
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The governorship election petition tribunal sitting in Abeokuta, the state capital, on Tuesday, 18 July, 2023 dismissed an objection raised by counsel to the  Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Gordy Uche (SAN), to the effect that under cross-examination, the petitioner’s witness must not be asked to compare his statement with those made by others.

Counsel to the 1st Respondent (INEC), Dr Remi Olatubora, had put questions across to a witness called by the PDP, Hon. Aina Adewale, from Sagamu, based on the similarities of his witness statement with two others, Sowande Seun, also from Sagamu and Ademola Adekunle, from Abeokuta North.

The similarities, according to the INEC’s counsel were to the extent of word for word and omission for omission, hence, the need to question the witness thoroughly to ascertain his veracity and accuracy.

However, in an objection to the application, the petitioner’s counsel said the Tribunal should not allow his witness to be questioned on documents which he did not author, quoting copiously Section 67 of the Evidence Act and other decided authorities.

In his response, counsel to INEC, Olatubora, prayed the panel to discountenance the objection, arguing that the points raised by the PDP’s counsel and his position on the points of law were irrelevant to the issue under review, relying on Section 223 of the Evidence Act. 

He argued that the Evidence Act allows him to cross-examine a witness in any manner that tests the witness’ credibility and veracity. 

He added that in line with the provision of that Section of the Evidence Act and in line with the spirit and letter of the 1999 constitution, which places a high premium on fair hearing, his position as the counsel to INEC confers the right on him to cross-examine the witness to test his veracity and knowledge.

Adding to Olatubora’s position, Governor Dapo Abiodun’s lawyer, Prof Taiwo Osipitan (SAN) added that one of the statutory purposes of cross-examination is to discover who a witness is. 

He added that in that regard, asking a witness to compare his witness statement with the statements of other witnesses is allowed because it allows the witness to explain why his evidence is completely the same as the evidence of a witness from somewhere else, while also giving the Tribunal to discover whether the witness is a copycat or another form of an unreliable witness. 

Counsel to the All Progressives Congress (APC), Otunba Kunle Kalejaiye submitted that PDP’s lawyer had not shown to the Tribunal whether the question asked of the witness was scandalous, immodest,  offensive, or of any other nature prohibited by law. 

He joined the other lawyers to ask the Tribunal to overrule the objection. 

The tribunal, therefore, overruled the objection raised by the counsel to PDP, referring to its previous rulings on similar objections.

In another development, counsel to the PDP was made to step down the appearance of a subpoenaed witness, a supposed INEC staff, who he claimed worked as a presiding officer during the March 18th governorship poll, after counsels to INEC raised objections to such testimony, citing the fact that the statement of the witness was only made yesterday and served on Respondents same day.

comparison objection Ogun Statement Tribunal witness
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Khadijah Olowode

Related Posts

25 years After First Forensic Lab in Lagos, NDLEA Gets Two More in Abuja, Enugu

May 12, 2025

Ex-Bayelsa MILAD Olubolade Dies At 70; How He Died – Children 

May 12, 2025

Ogun & The Returns Of Renewed Hope Investment Drive

May 12, 2025

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. The Gazelle News. Designed By DeedsTech.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.